Home / Case studies
Real Evisent client work · anonymised at our discretion · updated as engagements complete

Real Australian businesses.
Real findings. Real numbers. Anonymised where it matters.

Each case study below is built from a real Evisent engagement — actual audit findings, actual cost recoveries, actual security outcomes. Client names, tenant identifiers, incumbent provider names and other identifying detail are anonymised. Headline figures are preserved because they're unidentifiable on their own and they're what gives the story weight.

Take the AI Readiness Quiz → Request a sample report
Client engagement review
REAL · ANONYMISED · UPDATED MONTHLY
Live + in pipeline

Three live. Two in commissioning.

Three published case studies below in full — a Microsoft 365 due-diligence audit, a Business Email Compromise incident response, and an AI inbox-management Build that Evisent runs in active use. Further client engagements are being prepared for publication with client approval through 2026. As each is approved and anonymised, it appears here.

◉ Live · March 2026 B2B · 50 staff Incident response · BEC

607 phishing emails in 48 minutes. Contained by 6 AM.

An attacker compromised a Microsoft 365 account on 18 March, sat dormant for eight days, then sent 607 phishing emails to 560 recipients — including Australian Government departments, ASX-listed retailers, manufacturers and hospital networks — in 48 minutes. Evisent traced, contained and shut down the attack the same morning. No fraudulent payments were induced.

607
Phishing emails
in 48 minutes
8 days
Attacker dwell
time
6 AM
Contained same
morning
Read the full case study
◉ Live · May 2026 Wholesale · 35 staff Microsoft 365 Audit

$4,070 in savings. Seven high-severity findings. Two weeks.

A 35-staff Australian wholesale business engaged Evisent for cost optimisation. We met the brief — $4,070/yr in unused licences recovered ahead of renewal. We also surfaced seven high-severity findings the client didn't know they had — including an incumbent IT provider's admin account with no MFA, signed into 17 staff workstations.

$4,070
Annual savings
recovered
7 + 5
High + medium
findings
2 wks
Read-only audit
delivery time
Read the full case study
Built by Evisent
◉ In active use Inbox management M365 + Power Automate + Claude

Email = managed. 3.5 hours back, every week.

An AI-powered inbox manager built by Evisent and in active use. Reading and triaging email costs most professionals 2-4 hours a day. This automation classifies, routes, summarises and draft-replies through six processing layers, reclaiming around 3.5 hours a week, every week — and cutting inbox checks from ~25 a day to ~3.

3.5 hrs
Per week
reclaimed
~25 → 3
Inbox checks
per day
1–2 wks
Typical Build
delivery
Read the full case study
◯ In commissioning · ETA Q3 2026 M365 Audit

Audit no. 2 — to be published

A second Microsoft 365 audit engagement from earlier in 2026 is being prepared for publication. Anonymisation pass and client approval in progress.

◯ In commissioning · ETA Q4 2026 AI Governance

AI Governance Bundle — first cohort

The first AI Governance Bundle implementations are running through 2026. The quarterly governance reports from these engagements will form the basis for the first AI-side case studies.

◯ Further case studies Various

More in pipeline

Additional engagements across our verticals are being prepared for publication as they complete and as clients approve anonymised versions. Check back, or ask us directly for industry-specific examples.

Want to be featured?

Become one of the firms we feature.

We offer reduced engagement fees to clients who agree to be referenced (anonymised or named, your choice) in a published case study after delivery. The practical effect: your Sprint or Bundle pays back not just in operational outcomes, but in commercial value to your business if you'd benefit from being publicly associated with a forward-leaning AI governance posture.

Some clients prefer fully anonymous publication. Some — particularly those wanting to position themselves as forward-thinking in their industry — prefer to be named. Both work. We never publish without client review and explicit approval.

Book the Sprint → Or have a chat first